Star Wars Eclipse Vs Executor

 admin  
  1. Eclipse Star Destroyer Vs Supremacy
  2. Star Wars Eclipse Vs Executor Ohio

The winner is whoever shoots first. In all honesty, the superlaser being available to either side makes this this the Wild West duel of space battle; it’s a question of one shot. So, who would get that shot off? I’m gonna hazard a guess at the Ecl. Executor Star Destroyer Poster Star Wars by PatentPrintsPosters See more. Not sure what the big deal is, but yay for Eclipse day r/StarWars: Star Wars is an American epic space opera franchise, created by George Lucas and centered around a film series that began with the eponymous 1977 movie.

Star Wars Eclipse Vs Executor

SummaryThe Eclipse-class Dreadnought, also known as the Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer, was manufactured by the famous Kuat Drive Yards for the Galactic Empire. They were among the largest and most powerful warships of not only their era but in all of galactic history.Armed with a plethora of heavy laser cannons and turbolasers, they were a formidable class of warship. The unique looking durasteel and quadanium plated hull of the ship wasn’t designed merely to look intimidating but also enabled the ship to act as a giant 17.5 km battering ram; easily bisecting most capital ships on impact. What made the class truly fearsome however, was an axial superlaser similar to the component lasers making up the main concave superlaser of the Death Stars. A single shot was capable of obliterating fully shielded capital ships without even using the highest power setting and a full powered shot could easily penetrate planetary shields and potentially destabilize a planet’s crust.Although 1.5 km shorter overall than the Executor-class, it should be noted that the Eclipse-class outdid them in terms of volume, allowing them to act as better supercarriers and deploy greater forces into combat.=Powers and Stats7-B with heavy laser cannons. At least High 7-A with turbolasers. High 6-C with heavy turbolasers.

At least High 7-A by ramming.

Covenant ships in numbers have massive amounts of firepower.I beg to differ. According to the calculations of the well-renowned stardestoyer.net, the yield of a single standard turbolaser is 59 gigatons per shot.

Now compare that to a Super MAC Cannon, which is about 8 gigatons short, at 51.56 gigatons per shot(calculations from halo nation wiki). So a SINGLE TURBOLASER HAS MORE POWER THAN A SUPER MAC! I've heard that an SMAC was able to tear straight through 2 covie ships(idk what kind but plz tell me if u recognize this), and crippled a 3rd one. Well, imagine what would have happened were that a turbolaser! That 3rd ship would be gone! Also, let's look at each ROF. As seen in the movies, standard turbolasers fire once every second, making the ROF 60RPM.

Eclipse Star Destroyer Vs Supremacy

Star

Star Wars Eclipse Vs Executor Ohio

Now, we all know that the ROF fro ANY MAC cannon is extremely low. So a single turbolaser beats an SMAC in both firepower and speed. Now you know the power of a SINGLE STANDARD TURBOLASER, let's look at the armament of an Executor-class SSD: 5000 TURBOLASERS!!!!!! 2000 of them are those standard turbolasers, 2000 HEAVY TURBOLASERS(these bad boys have higher yields, ranging in the teratons!), and the last 1000 made of point defense and ion cannons and stuff).

If the executor used ONLY its 2000 standard turbolasers on the CSO, then the total yield of that would be approx. 147,500 GIGATONS. PER SECOND!!!!!

I think that made round to several teratons!!! CAN A CSO WITHSTAND THAT MUCH FIREPOWER?????!!!! With that much power, the executor ALONE can take on the ENTIRE UNSC FLEET AND WIN WITH NO CASUALLTIES! Star WarsHalo. : sD.net isn't renowned at all, and at no point in time has any star destroyer ever displayed that kind of firepower. Let's see you back those claims up with a feat or two.

A 59 gigaton shot turbolaser would ignite the atmosphere of a planet.there are dozens upon dozens upon dozens of non wank calcs and guides superscede everything on sd.net and in the ics.If turbolaser does 59 gigatons pershot then let's see some evidence of it actually doing that damage. Because not even the EU has any examples of anything even remotely resembling that.

   Coments are closed